At least one Republican, Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the No. 3 in the Senate, urged his House colleagues on Thursday to slow their push to release the memo.
Mr. Thune said he thought that the Senate Intelligence Committee and its Republican chairman, Senator Richard Burr of North Carolina, should be allowed to see the document before its release. He also said that House Republicans should carefully consider the F.B.I.’s warning that it had “grave concerns” about making the memo public.
“They need to pay careful attention to what our folks who protect us have to say about what this, you know, how this bears on our national security,” Mr. Thune told reporters at the Republicans’ annual policy retreat at the Greenbrier resort in West Virginia.
Mr. Thune also called for a Democratic memo rebutting the Republican document to be shown to the public at the same time.
In a rare statement on Wednesday, the F.B.I. strongly condemned the memo’s release, saying the bureau had “grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.”
People familiar the three-and-a-half page Republican memo say it contends that officials from the F.B.I. and Justice Department may have misled a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court judge when they sought a warrant to spy on Mr. Page in October 2016. The people say the officials relied on information handed over by a former British intelligence officer, Christopher Steele, without adequately explaining to the judge that Democrats had financed his research.
Also at issue on Thursday were charges by Democrats that the Republicans had made “material changes” to the memo after the Intelligence Committee voted to release it but before it was transmitted to the White House for review. Representative Adam Schiff of California, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, wrote in a letter late Wednesday that the committee needed to restart the process and vote again on the revised memo under the same never-before-used House rules that the committee invoked to vote on the release. The committee had initially voted along party lines on Monday in favor of release.
Continue reading the main story
The letter started yet another round of finger-pointing among committee members, who have bitterly wrestled over the memo. Republicans quickly countered Wednesday night that Mr. Schiff was “complaining about minor edits” and said their vote was “absolutely procedurally sound.” Another person familiar with the changes described them as more than cosmetic and an attempt to water down assertions made in the document.
In a sharply worded letter of her own Thursday morning, Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the Democratic leader, called on Mr. Ryan to remove Mr. Nunes as the Intelligence Committee’s chairman.
“Congressman Nunes’ deliberately dishonest actions make him unfit to serve as Chairman, and he must be removed immediately from this position,” she wrote, adding, “The integrity of the House is at stake.”
Mr. Nunes gave no indication that he intended to change course.
Mr. Trump had five days from the time of the vote to review the document for national security concerns and try to block it. The president apparently made up his mind quickly, telling a Republican congressman after his State of the Union address Tuesday night that he would not stop the release.
The White House also allowed officials from the nation’s intelligence agencies to review the document, but the Senate Intelligence Committee’s earlier request to see the memo was declined by House Republicans.
Continue reading the main story