‘Calexit’ co-founder: Elizabeth Warren might not be ‘allowed in’ proposed California spinoff reserved for Native Americans

Politics
3
0


The plan to break California off from the rest of the U.S. is back with a new twist. The leaders of Calexit have announced a new version of their plot to create an independent California: All federal lands in California will be returned to the Indian tribes, creating the first ever autonomous Native American nation in North America. #Tucker
Video

Behind the plan for the autonomous Native American nation

The plan to break California off from the rest of the U.S. is back with a new twist. The leaders of Calexit have announced a new version of their plot to create an independent California: All federal lands in California will be returned to the Indian tribes, creating “the first ever autonomous Native American nation in North America.” #Tucker

The co-founder of a movement calling for California to secede from America — after giving away nearly half the state to form an “autonomous Native American nation” — suggested Wednesday that Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren might not be welcome in the proposed new territory.

Speaking on Fox News’ “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” “Calexit” organizer Marcus Ruiz Evans said the issue ultimately would be up to the “brown-skinned” inhabitants of the California spinoff state.

“Elizabeth Warren would not be able to come in there, unless the Native people of the area say she’s welcome,” Evans said. “If they didn’t do that, it doesn’t matter what she says; she wouldn’t be allowed in.”

Warren has long been accused of falsely saying she is of Native American heritage to help in securing jobs, including one as a Harvard law professor. President Trump has repeatedly called Warren, a Wall Street critic and potential White House rival, “Pocahontas,” to highlight the controversy. 

‘REAL INDIAN’ RUNNING AGAINST SEN. WARREN SUES AFTER CITY DEMANDS HE STOP CALLING HER ‘FAKE INDIAN’

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) questions Alex Azar (not pictured) during a Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee hearing on his nomination to be Health and Human Services secretary on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., November 29, 2017. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas - RC14E72F6F40

President Trump has suggested tossing a DNA testing kit at Warren during a presidential debate.

 (AP)

Supporters of Trump, Evans said, shouldn’t expect a much better reception.

“The primarily Trump voters will have to do what brown-skinned people tell them to do, because brown-skinned people will be in charge,” Evans told host Tucker Carlson. “And if they don’t like that, they’re welcome to leave California.”

Calexit’s new plan to give Native Americans all federal lands in the state, running from the border with Mexico to the state boundary shared with Oregon, was announced earlier this week.

Because most of the federal land would include conservative-leaning portions of California, the plan would create a “buffer zone between Donald Trump’s America and the new independent California Republic,” Evans said in a statement Tuesday.

Evans explained to Carlson that while eastern California admittedly isn’t the state’s prime real estate, giving it away “would at least be a step in the right direction” — and, he claimed, a better system than existing Native American reservations, which he said remain subject to federal interference.

calexit

TRUMP SUGGESTS SLOWLY TOSSING DNA TESTING KIT AT WARREN DURING PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE

Another Calexit co-founder, Louis Marinelli, told Fox News he is well-aware that many conservatives support California leaving the rest of the country.

“We would love to see official numbers on nationwide support for Calexit,” he said, adding that, “on a constant basis … people [are] emailing how they want California to secede, or as they put it: break off and fall into the ocean.”

Calexit is distinct from Cal 3, a prominent parallel effort to split California into three states, purportedly to improve its governance.

The California Supreme Court earlier this month blocked the Cal 3 proposal from the November ballot, saying it was too significant a change to the state’s structure to be undertaken by a ballot initiative. Instead, the court ruled, the state’s constitution required action by the legislature.

The move was a setback not just for Cal 3, but also for Calexit, whose organizers say is often confused for Cal 3 and could face similar legal objections.

Gregg Re is an editor for Fox News. Follow him on Twitter @gregg_re.

Facebook Comments

POST A COMMENT.